时间标签：数据日期 2026-10-31 · 生成时间 2026-11-01 05:30（Asia/Shanghai）｜ 检索窗口 PubMed edat 2026/10/28–2026/10/31 ｜ 情报发生日期 2026-10-31
研究问题
However, less is known about how individuals’ experiences of pandemic-related stress were associated with ageist attitudes and expectations regarding aging within the Australian context.；However, observed intergenerational tensions may diminish this potential for collective resilience (; ).；This study aimed to explore ageism, and attitudes toward aging in Australia, during the COVID-19 pandemic.
方法
Participants ranged in age from 19 to 82 years (M = 40.73, SD = 14.74) and were recruited through word of mouth, snowball sampling, and social media.；The study criteria required participants to be at least 18 years of age and currently residing in Australia.；An adapted form of the AAS, created by was used to measure benevolent and hostile ageism among participants.；A measure asking participants for two adjectives that ‘described older adults’ was included to provide additional insight into participants’ age-related attitudes.
核心结论
The data were split based on participant age for exploratory analyses, and those who were 65 years of age or older formed the older adult group (N = 32), and other participants between 18 and 64 years of age formed the younger adult group (N = 234).；On closer inspection, most outliers did not appear to represent sampling or measurement errors, and thus were retained for analysis.；Significant deviations from linearity were also observed among several variables. ‖ 结论：These findings extended existing research on the relationships between contact quality and ageism, providing insight into the perceptions of a mixed-age sample of Australians toward older adults.
局限
This study explored ageism, expectations regarding aging, and the quality of contact with older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic, using an online, cross-sectional correlational study design, and a combination of established and novel measures.；Consequently, this measure may not have been appropriate for examining this specific association and therefore may explain the lack of relationship found.；Similarly, despite literature suggesting that ageism may be related to social discord, the endorsement of ageist beliefs may not reflect behavioral intentions that would decrease social cohesion, thus explaining these unexpected findings ().
对本项目的价值
★☆☆☆☆ 相关范围内，作为背景与横向对照收录。设计 cross-sectional。
全文来源
PMC JATS 全文（正文 40,707 字符，已过标题/DOI 逐字归属校验）
原文题录
- 英文标题：Ageism toward older adults during COVID-19: associations with emotional coping and intergenerational contact.
- 期刊与标识：Front Psychol · PMID 42959338 · DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1949869
A 级证据分级：A 级（同行评议人体研究）
本文属人体研究证据，但需注意：观察性或小样本干预的结论不等于已证实临床获益；效应量与长期安全性仍需更大规模、更长随访的试验验证。
关于本文的文献来源：本站依据 IMA 知识库「五刊监控·深度文献卡片」撰写，依据已获取的期刊全文（方法、样本量与结论已回到原文核对）；未能获取全文的同批条目另行标注「摘要级」，全程未做任何数值推算补全。