时间标签：数据日期 2026-10-31 · 生成时间 2026-11-01 05:30（Asia/Shanghai）｜ 检索窗口 PubMed edat 2026/10/28–2026/10/31 ｜ 情报发生日期 2026-10-31
研究问题
To address these challenges, a sufficiently prepared nursing workforce is essential.；However, Germany continues to face substantial shortages in the nursing workforce, particularly within geriatric and long-term care settings.；However, the ASD can be applied to assess attitudes across different age groups rather than specifically focusing on older adults.
方法
This cross-sectional study followed the STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines () () and employed a two-phase design consisting of cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric validation.；According to the principle of factor analysis procedure, a sample size of at least 5–10 participants per item is recommended ().；Inclusion criteria were (a) being a nursing student at a German-speaking nursing school and (b) being aged 16 years or older, consistent with the minimum age in German-speaking countries after completion of compulsory schooling (), with sufficient cognitive and judgmental capacity to understand the study information.；Finally, a total of 228 questionnaires were collected.
核心结论
Almost all students worked with older adults in their profession or job (98.6%) or visited a nursing home or a geriatric clinic (88.4%).；Interrater agreement was assessed using Kendall’s coefficient of concordance, yielding a statistically significant level of agreement among experts (Kendall’s W = 0.62, p < 0.001).；The correlation coefficient between the score of each item and the total score of the scale ranged from 0.223 to 0.875 (p < 0.001) (). ‖ 结论：Nursing schools and educators may use these findings to design tailored interventions aimed at enhancing students’ willingness to work with older adults and ultimately support evidence-based planning for geriatric care workforce development.
局限
Therefore, the “Subjective Norm” dimension should be interpreted cautiously.；As these variables were not included in the multivariable model, this finding should be interpreted as an exploratory observation rather than as an independently established group difference.；This finding may also be interpreted in light of the social projection process (), whereby individuals may draw on their own experiences to form generalized perceptions of others.
对本项目的价值
★☆☆☆☆ 干预证据决定参照标准效应量——任何抗衰干预的收益至少应对标该基线。设计 cross-sectional。
全文来源
PMC JATS 全文（正文 42,806 字符，已过标题/DOI 逐字归属校验）
原文题录
- 英文标题：Identifying future geriatric nurses: psychometric evaluation of the German Willingness to Work with Elderly People Scale among nursing students.
- 期刊与标识：Front Psychol · PMID 42959065 · DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1933160
A 级证据分级：A 级（同行评议人体研究）
本文属人体研究证据，但需注意：观察性或小样本干预的结论不等于已证实临床获益；效应量与长期安全性仍需更大规模、更长随访的试验验证。
关于本文的文献来源：本站依据 IMA 知识库「五刊监控·深度文献卡片」撰写，依据已获取的期刊全文（方法、样本量与结论已回到原文核对）；未能获取全文的同批条目另行标注「摘要级」，全程未做任何数值推算补全。