研究进展

超大巨型城市养老服务空间网络的结构分化与协同优化:以广州为例

来源:Frontiers in public health · PMID 42973592 · DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2026.1960926 · 来源:IMA 知识库《文献层·文献监控卡片》2026-11-05 期 · 全文级(file_id dAlZBwueyWSz,实际下载核验 1,395,640 B) · 全文已获取并通过三重归属校验

时间标签:数据日期 2026-11-05 · 生成时间 2026-11-05 05:30(Asia/Shanghai)| 检索窗口 PubMed edat 2026/11/02 – 2026/11/06 | 情报发生日期 2026-11-05

研究问题

1IntroductionAgainst the backdrop of an increasingly aging population, whether pension care resources can be rationally distributed and coordinated across regions has become a critical issue for improving the accessibility and equity of urban pension care services.;In megacities, the spatial effectiveness of pension care resources depends not only on where resources are located, but also on whether districts are connected through transportation networks, service referrals, institutional collaboration, and resource sharing.;Spatial justice concerns whether older adults in different areas have equitable opportunities to access services.

方法

We construct an evaluation system across three dimensions—institutional care capacity, home-based and community-based care capacity, and medical support capacity for pension care—to assess the overall development level of pension care services in each district.;The study therefore follows a progressive analytical sequence of “identifying regional service capacity-measuring potential interdistrict linkages-analyzing overall network structure.”2.2Main developments in spatial research on pension care servicesExisting research on the spatial organization of pension care services has focused first on service accessibility and has gradually moved beyond static geographic distance toward more realistic transport and behavioral conditions.;Second, transport conditions are usually treated as factors affecting residents’ ability to reach services, while their role as interdistrict spatial resistance shaping the strength of cross-district linkages has received less attention.

核心结论

Research on community-based integrated care (28) and long-term care utilization (29) further indicates that individual characteristics, family support, and institutional capacity jointly shape pension care needs.2.3Research gaps and analytical frameworkExisting studies have provided substantial insight into the distribution of pension care facilities, spatial accessibility, resource efficiency, and supply–demand matching.;Haizhu District is low in all three dimensions, and the gap between pension service supply and the demand of an aging population is more pronounced.Overall, the development of pension care services in Guangzhou shows a multi-center, functionally differentiated spatial pattern.;Overall, the spatial network of pension care services in Guangzhou has formed a structure with Baiyun District as the main core, Tianhe District as the sub-core, Liwan District and Nansha District as important supporting nodes, and other regions participating hierarchically.5.4.2.2.2Closeness centralityOut-closeness centrality reflects the convenience of establishing pension service links between a region and other regions through direct or indirect paths.

局限

Less attention, however, has been paid to potential relationships across administrative districts and to the structure of the resulting urban network.;Traditional gravity models often use geographic distance as a measure of spatial impedance; however, cross-district connections for pension care services are also influenced by public transportation travel time, transfer costs, route connectivity, and age-friendly travel conditions.;However, the absolute magnitude of the subsequent gravity-model estimates depends on the adopted scale.

对本项目的价值

中等价值:属「衰老机制与老年临床」方向;其他衰老相关栏目可用作本项目文献库与综述素材。 | 价值分 2.6/5(★★★☆☆)

全文来源

PubMed PMC JATS(正文 69,180 字符,题名指纹 0.76,已过 PubMed PMCID 官方关联 + 题名指纹 + 正文长度归属校验)

原文题录

  • 中文题名:超大巨型城市养老服务空间网络的结构分化与协同优化:以广州为例
  • 英文标题:Structural differentiation and collaborative optimization of the spatial network of pension care service in megacity behemoths: a case study of Guangzhou, China.
  • 期刊与标识:Frontiers in public health · PMID 42973592 · DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2026.1960926 · PMC PMC13724581

A 级证据分级:A 级(同行评议人体研究)

本文属人体研究证据,但需注意:观察性或小样本干预的结论不等于已证实临床获益;效应量与长期安全性仍需更大规模、更长随访的试验验证。

关于本文的文献来源:本站依据 IMA 知识库「五刊监控·深度文献卡片」撰写,依据已获取的期刊全文(方法、样本量与结论已回到原文核对);未能获取全文的同批条目另行标注「摘要级」,全程未做任何数值推算补全。