方法学

口腔衰弱量表的分层推荐:谁该在哪一层用哪个工具

来源:JDR Clin Trans Res · PMID 42935451 · DOI 10.1177/23800844261491670** · 来源:IMA 知识库《文献层·文献监控卡片》2026-10-29 期 · 摘要级(file_id dGBunAeRiRlm,下载实测 692,872 B) · 摘要级,未获取付费墙全文

数据日期 2026-10-29 · 生成时间 2026-10-29 06:03

证据级别:摘要级。本条依据 PubMed 结构化摘要与元数据撰写,付费墙全文未获取、未逐节核验,本站未做任何数值推算补全。

研究问题

Oral frailty (OF) is increasingly recognized as a critical component of healthy aging, yet the lack of standardized assessment instruments hinders clinical implementation and comparative research.

方法

A systematic search of MEDLINE/PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library was conducted from inception through July 24, 2025.;Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were evaluated according to the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) 2.0 guidelines for methodological quality, measurement properties, and evidence levels.;From 6,208 records, 15 studies with 15 distinct instruments were included.

核心结论

Studies developing or validating oral frailty assessment instruments in older adults were included.;Clinical measures were summarized descriptively.;Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were evaluated according to the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) 2.0 guidelines for methodological quality, measurement properties, and evidence levels. ‖ 结论:Our analysis suggests stratified recommendations: SOFT appears most suitable for community nurses conducting broad screening, Oral Frailty 5-Item Questionnaire (OF-5) and OF signs may be preferable for general practitioners in primary care, and the OF-6 is currently the most appropriate reference standard for hospital dental specialists.

局限

未能获取全文,具体设计细节、失访与统计学处理无法核验。

对本项目的价值

★★☆☆☆ 衰弱/肌少症是少有的已有监管认可终点的老年综合征,是临床转化的最短路径。

原文题录

  • 英文标题:Oral Frailty Assessments for Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Methodological Evaluation.
  • 期刊与标识:JDR Clin Trans Res · PMID 42935451 · DOI 10.1177/23800844261491670**

C 级证据分级:C 级(预印本 / 观点评论,非原始研究)

本文属观点/评论类文献,不是原始研究。其论点依赖于作者对既有证据的梳理与判断,不构成新的实验证据。本站标注 C 级即为此意——阅读时请把它当作「领域内的思考框架」,而非「研究发现」。

关于本文的文献来源:本站依据 IMA 知识库「五刊监控·深度文献卡片」(SOP §4.2 摘要级)撰写,依据期刊公开摘要与 PubMed 元数据;付费墙全文未获取之处已标注「待补全文」,未做任何数值推算补全。