研究进展

宿主与微生物签名对晚期非小细胞肺癌免疫治疗应答的整合分层

来源:Genome medicine · PMID 42972584 · DOI 10.1186/s13073-026-01736-5 · 来源:IMA 知识库《文献层·文献监控卡片》2026-11-05 期 · 全文级(file_id dAlZBwueyWSz,实际下载核验 1,395,640 B) · 全文已获取并通过三重归属校验

时间标签:数据日期 2026-11-05 · 生成时间 2026-11-05 05:30(Asia/Shanghai)| 检索窗口 PubMed edat 2026/11/02 – 2026/11/06 | 情报发生日期 2026-11-05

研究问题

In contrast, responders showed significantly lower intakes of fat (29.6 versus 46.4 g; P = 0.021), monounsaturated fatty acids (8.1 versus 14.7 g; P = 0.040), polyunsaturated fatty acids (6.0 versus 12.9 g; P = 0.009), omega-3 fatty acids (0.8 versus 1.6 g; P = 0.021), and omega-6 fatty acids (5.5 versus 11.8 g; P = 0.009) in the monotherapy group.Identifying response-associated microbial featuresWe first assessed whether overall gut microbial composition differed between responders and non-responders by analyzing taxonomic profiles from screening stool samples (Fig. 1A).;P values above the plots were calculated using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test or Fisher’s exact testTo assess whether overall gut microbiome composition differed between treatment groups, we performed PCoA based on Bray–Curtis dissimilarity at the genus level (Additional file 1: Fig.;S5).Next, we investigated Faecalibacterium and Lactobacillus at baseline stool samples, given their contrasting associations with clinical outcomes.

方法

BackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized treatment paradigm in various solid tumors, yet only a subset of patients achieves durable benefit [1].;Associations between the gut microbiome and the efficacy of ICI were first reported in mouse models in 2015 [2, 3] and later identified in patients in 2018 [4–6].;These studies demonstrated that fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) from ICI responders into germ-free mice improved tumor control [4–6].

核心结论

These studies demonstrated that fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) from ICI responders into germ-free mice improved tumor control [4–6].;We found that the acetate-to-butyrate biosynthesis cluster was predominantly found in butyrate-producing bacteria such as Faecalibacterium, Agathobacter, Roseburia, Gemmiger, and Anaerostipes (Additional file 2: Table S4).;S26A), these results suggest that the bacterial ratio score explains a distinct aspect of response to ICI, which is independent of TMB.

局限

C Proportion of responders in each group stratified by combined TMB and the bacterial ratio scoreWe also calculated several transcriptomic scores previously linked to ICI outcomes, including IFNG [53], expanded IFNG [53], IMPRES [54], IPS [55], TIDE [56], and TLS [57]; however, none of these scores exceeded AUC values of 0.6 (Additional file 2: Table S12).We compared features from flow cytometry and cytokine assays between responders and non-responders (Fig. 5A).;However, this previous study did not assess the relationship between probiotic use and the abundance of probiotic bacteria.;Incorporating these additional microbial features may further improve response classification.The differential patterns observed between monotherapy and combination groups warrant further exploration.

对本项目的价值

中高价值:属「微生物组及其代谢物干预」方向;微生物组及其代谢物干预栏目可用作本项目文献库与综述素材。 | 价值分 3.0/5(★★★☆☆)

全文来源

PubMed PMC JATS(正文 65,285 字符,题名指纹 0.88,已过 PubMed PMCID 官方关联 + 题名指纹 + 正文长度归属校验)

原文题录

  • 中文题名:宿主与微生物签名对晚期非小细胞肺癌免疫治疗应答的整合分层
  • 英文标题:Integrative stratification of response to immunotherapy using host and microbial signatures in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
  • 期刊与标识:Genome medicine · PMID 42972584 · DOI 10.1186/s13073-026-01736-5 · PMC PMC13729566

A 级证据分级:A 级(同行评议人体研究)

本文属人体研究证据,但需注意:观察性或小样本干预的结论不等于已证实临床获益;效应量与长期安全性仍需更大规模、更长随访的试验验证。

关于本文的文献来源:本站依据 IMA 知识库「五刊监控·深度文献卡片」撰写,依据已获取的期刊全文(方法、样本量与结论已回到原文核对);未能获取全文的同批条目另行标注「摘要级」,全程未做任何数值推算补全。