时间标签：数据日期 2026-10-31 · 生成时间 2026-11-01 05:30（Asia/Shanghai）｜ 检索窗口 PubMed edat 2026/10/28–2026/10/31 ｜ 情报发生日期 2026-10-31
研究问题
Under these conditions, an auricular prosthesis is a viable option, and it is commonly retained using medical adhesives and craniofacial implants; however, the latter are preferred in terms of stability, predictability, comfort, and esthetics.；The application of implants in pediatric populations remains limited by bone quantity and quality.；However, such problems can resolve after ear reconstruction, resulting in improved well-being and quality of life (QoL) of patients with maxillofacial prosthetics.
方法
This retrospective research was approved by the institutional review board of Jordan University of Science and Technology (IRB 264-2024).；Between May 2013 and May 2024, 24 patients were fitted with auricular prostheses and a retrospective analysis of their charts was performed.；The QoL questionnaire used was a custom, site-specific instrument developed by our clinical team, adapted from previously validated tools for maxillofacial prosthetics QoL assessment.；The questionnaire was not formally validated in the broader population but had undergone internal face and content validation by three senior maxillofacial prosthodontists.
核心结论
Patients referred for auricular prosthetic rehabilitation were managed through a standardized multidisciplinary team including maxillofacial and/or otolaryngology surgeons, prosthodontists, and clinical scientists.；The treatment pathway included patient consultation and treatment planning, evaluation of suitability for prosthetic reconstruction, selection of retention method (implant-retained or adhesive-retained), prosthesis fabrication, and structured follow-up assessments.；The reasons for selecting adhesive retention did not differ significantly in frequency (P = .670) and included poor bone quality and quantity (40%), desire for a reversible treatment option (40%), and reluctance to undergo surgery (20%). ‖ 结论：These findings highlight a need for improvements in adhesive formulations to enhance patient comfort and usability.
局限
Regardless, surgical reconstruction may not always be feasible due to medical, anatomical, or personal preference considerations.；The study has some limitations, including the retrospective design and the relatively small cohort within each retention group, preventing robust statistical comparisons between prosthetic systems, though auricular prosthetic rehabilitation is relatively uncommon and most published studies report small single-center cohorts.；Also, treatment plans were customized according to each individual patient, which has led to heterogeneity in retention methods.
对本项目的价值
★☆☆☆☆ 相关范围内，作为背景与横向对照收录。
全文来源
PMC JATS 全文（正文 22,180 字符，已过标题/DOI 逐字归属校验）
原文题录
- 英文标题：Clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction with auricular prostheses: an 11-year retrospective study.
- 期刊与标识：J Adv Prosthodont · PMID 42948541 · DOI 10.4047/jap.2026.18.5.484
A 级证据分级：A 级（同行评议人体研究）
本文属人体研究证据，但需注意：观察性或小样本干预的结论不等于已证实临床获益；效应量与长期安全性仍需更大规模、更长随访的试验验证。
关于本文的文献来源：本站依据 IMA 知识库「五刊监控·深度文献卡片」撰写，依据已获取的期刊全文（方法、样本量与结论已回到原文核对）；未能获取全文的同批条目另行标注「摘要级」，全程未做任何数值推算补全。