数据日期 2026-10-29 · 生成时间 2026-10-29 06:03
研究问题
Healthy aging depends partly on the capacity to maintain adaptive movement, learn new skills, and coordinate action with changing sensory and cognitive demands.
方法
Instrument-related terms included combinations such as “musical instrument,” “musical instruments,” “instrumental practice,” “instrumental training,” “music training,” “musical training,” “instrument playing,” “instrument learning,” piano, keyboard, percussion, drum*, drumming, melodica, “keyboard harmonica,” “string instrument,” “string instruments,” violin*, viola, cello, guitar*, “wind instrument,” “wind instruments,” “brass instrument,” “brass instruments,” flute*, clarinet*, saxophone*, recorder*, trumpet*, and trombone*, combined with aging- and outcome-related terms using Boolean operators adapted to the indexing requirements of each database.；For the core intervention evidence, priority was given to studies explicitly investigating older-adult populations in which participants were predominantly aged ≥ 60 years.；Studies that included younger participants below this threshold were retained only as contextual evidence when the sample was explicitly defined as an older-adult cohort or when findings relevant to participants aged ≥ 60 years could be interpreted…
核心结论
No meta-analysis, formal risk-of-bias assessment, or certainty-of-evidence grading was undertaken.；The nonrandom allocation and 25% overall attrition also limit causal precision. ‖ 结论：On current evidence, the field supports cautious optimism about targeted sensorimotor and cognitive adaptation, not broad claims of neuroprotection or dementia prevention.
局限
全文未设独立 limitations 节；结构上为综述/二次研究，因果推断强度受限。
对本项目的价值
★★★☆☆ 脑老化是最大未满足需求，也是终点最难量化的领域；biomarker 与认知读数选择最敏感。最大样本量约 268；设计 Meta 分析、系统综述。
全文来源
PMC JATS 全文（正文 67,847 字符，已过标题/DOI 逐字归属校验）
原文题录
- 英文标题：Musical Instrument Practice as Sensorimotor and Motor-Cognitive Skill Training in Healthy Aging.
- 期刊与标识：Brain Sci · PMID 42939291 · DOI 10.3390/brainsci16101038**
C 级证据分级：C 级（预印本 / 观点评论，非原始研究）
本文属观点/评论类文献，不是原始研究。其论点依赖于作者对既有证据的梳理与判断，不构成新的实验证据。本站标注 C 级即为此意——阅读时请把它当作「领域内的思考框架」，而非「研究发现」。
关于本文的文献来源：本站依据 IMA 知识库「五刊监控·深度文献卡片」撰写，依据已获取的期刊全文（方法、样本量与结论已回到原文核对）；未能获取全文的同批条目另行标注「摘要级」，全程未做任何数值推算补全。