时间标签：数据日期 2026-10-31 · 生成时间 2026-11-01 05:30（Asia/Shanghai）｜ 检索窗口 PubMed edat 2026/10/28–2026/10/31 ｜ 情报发生日期 2026-10-31
研究问题
The Leadership Forum on Successful Aging and Longevity was developed in response to this challenge as a university-based pilot educational workshop combining scientific input, discussion across professional and sectoral perspectives, and structured group reflection.；In 2020, there were more people aged ≥60 years than children younger than 5 years ().；These demographic changes raise a central public health question: whether gains in longevity are also accompanied by health, autonomy, dignity, participation, and meaningful social connection.
方法
We used a community case study approach to describe the design, implementation, and preliminary evaluation of the Leadership Forum on Successful Aging and Longevity.；The evaluation was preliminary because it relied on immediate post-forum feedback and descriptive workshop materials, with no pre-forum measures, longitudinal follow-up, or additional data collection.；Nineteen of the 27 general attendees voluntarily completed the anonymous post-forum questionnaire and constituted the questionnaire sample, corresponding to a response proportion of 70.4%.；Organizers and invited contributors were not included in the questionnaire sample.
核心结论
Sixteen respondents provided a written response to the open-ended question asking which activities or aspects of the event they particularly enjoyed; three entered “N/A.” Comments referred to the keynote and other speakers, the expertise and perspectives represented on the panel, the breakout-group format, and opportunities to hear and discuss ideas with other participants.；Seven respondents provided a specific suggestion or concern in response to the question about what could be improved in future events.；These included problems with room audio or microphone quality, access to presentation slides in a larger format or electronically, and interest in additional content related to aging and cognitive decline, hearing, and speech-language pathology. ‖ 结论：Without pre-forum measures or longitudinal follow-up, the evaluation cannot support conclusions about changes in learning, attitudes, behavior, collaboration, or longer-term outcomes.
局限
On that basis, the forum met its immediate purpose of piloting a structured format for discussion, exploring barriers to applying knowledge in practice, and obtaining preliminary feedback.；The questionnaire was based on 19 voluntary post-forum responses and may not reflect all attendees' views.；The voluntary sample may have been subject to self-selection and social-desirability bias, with responses concentrated in the highest categories, limiting differentiation at the upper end of the scales.
对本项目的价值
★☆☆☆☆ 脑老化是最大未满足需求，也是终点最难量化的领域；biomarker 与认知读数选择最敏感。
全文来源
PMC JATS 全文（正文 37,511 字符，已过标题/DOI 逐字归属校验）
原文题录
- 英文标题：Designing cross-sector leadership dialogue for successful aging: a forum-based case study and preliminary participant evaluation.
- 期刊与标识：Front Public Health · PMID 42959678 · DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2026.1951537
A 级证据分级：A 级（同行评议人体研究）
本文属人体研究证据，但需注意：观察性或小样本干预的结论不等于已证实临床获益；效应量与长期安全性仍需更大规模、更长随访的试验验证。
关于本文的文献来源：本站依据 IMA 知识库「五刊监控·深度文献卡片」撰写，依据已获取的期刊全文（方法、样本量与结论已回到原文核对）；未能获取全文的同批条目另行标注「摘要级」，全程未做任何数值推算补全。