时间标签：数据日期 2026-10-31 · 生成时间 2026-11-01 05:30（Asia/Shanghai）｜ 检索窗口 PubMed edat 2026/10/28–2026/10/31 ｜ 情报发生日期 2026-10-31
研究问题
Although many studies examine predictors of retirement-related decisions, relatively few focus on the decision itself – whether to continue working or leave the labor market (Amorim et al., ).；To address this gap, we developed a new instrument to assess retirement-related decisions, described in the Method section.；However, early retirement may also occur when older workers have sufficient financial resources to exit the workforce before the legal age.
方法
A total of 1,371 workers from Brazil (55.7%) and Portugal (44.3%), aged 50 or over, participated in the study.；The participants lived in 24 states plus the Federal District, with the Southeastern states being the most represented: Rio de Janeiro (28.1%), São Paulo (18.7%) and Minas Gerais (10.6%).；In terms of level of education, a large proportion had Graduate Certificate/Specialization (Lato Sensu) degrees (32.6%), followed by Master''s degrees (18.2%), undergraduate degrees (16.6%), high school degrees (12.2%), PhDs (10.9%), post-doctoral degrees (5.1%) and elementary school degrees (4.5%).；The majority of participants self-identified as white (68.1%), followed by mixed-race (Pardo) (22.8%), black (7.1%), and indigenous or asian (2.1%).
核心结论
Bartlett''s test was significant (χ2 = 5,765.44; p <.001), indicating that the correlation matrix Table between the items allowed factor analysis to be carried out.；However, this solution resulted in several items (6, 10, 20) with low factor loadings (<.40) or problematic cross-loadings.；() demonstrated a systematic model-size effect on RMSEA, such that models with fewer observed variables tend to yield higher RMSEA values than larger models under comparable levels of model specification. ‖ 结论：Beyond addressing these limitations, the validated RDI has important practical implications for multiple stakeholders involved in retirement planning and workforce management.
局限
The bridge employment dimension of the RDI warrants particular attention, as this concept may be less familiar or more ambiguous in certain professional and cultural contexts.；Furthermore, the statutory retirement age in Portugal is higher than in Brazil, which could potentially contribute to differences in functional capacity and work readiness at the point of retirement eligibility, though this relationship warrants further investigation.；Despite the contributions of this study, it is necessary to highlight some limitations that should be considered when interpreting the results.
对本项目的价值
★☆☆☆☆ 脑老化是最大未满足需求，也是终点最难量化的领域；biomarker 与认知读数选择最敏感。
全文来源
PMC JATS 全文（正文 42,119 字符，已过标题/DOI 逐字归属校验）
原文题录
- 英文标题：Development and Validity Evidence of the Retirement Decision Inventory (RDI) in Brazil and Portugal.
- 期刊与标识：J Cross Cult Gerontol · PMID 42955173 · DOI 10.1007/s10823-026-09603-x
A 级证据分级：A 级（同行评议人体研究）
本文属人体研究证据，但需注意：观察性或小样本干预的结论不等于已证实临床获益；效应量与长期安全性仍需更大规模、更长随访的试验验证。
关于本文的文献来源：本站依据 IMA 知识库「五刊监控·深度文献卡片」撰写，依据已获取的期刊全文（方法、样本量与结论已回到原文核对）；未能获取全文的同批条目另行标注「摘要级」，全程未做任何数值推算补全。