时间标签：数据日期 2026-11-01 · 生成时间 2026-11-01 05:30（Asia/Shanghai）｜ 检索窗口 PubMed edat 2026/10/31–2026/11/01 ｜ 情报发生日期 2026-11-01
研究问题
However, there is still no consensus in the literature regard- ing which instruments are most appropriate for assessing frailty syndrome specifically in adults with obesity and most frailty screening instruments were originally developed…；Therefore, a comprehensive review of the
方法
These observational findings are likely influenced by associated health conditions, disease sever- ity, and selection into high-risk clinical pathways, limiting exchangeability even after statistical adjustment.
核心结论
Overall, these findings indicate that frailty assessment is both feasible and clinically meaningful in adults with obesity and that frailty status was consistently associated with clinical outcomes across settings, with instruments increasingly refined and…；Conclusion There are ten different instruments for frailty assessment in adults with obesity, they are heterogeneous and mainly focus on comorbidity-related aspects.；Currently, none of the instruments, Conclusion Frailty assessment tools for adults with obesity are hetero- geneous and predominantly focused on comorbidity-related aspects, frequently underrepresenting key domains such as cognitive function, psychosocial…
局限
Although frailty was consistently associated with adverse clinical outcomes across studies, these findings were derived from observational designs and should be interpreted with caution.；Limitations and Strengths Most studies were constrained by retrospective or observa- tional designs, potential selection bias, and highly specific clinical samples.
对本项目的价值
综述级证据，用于快速对齐领域共识与空白：功能结局（衰弱 / 肌少症）是临床转化最可及的终点，适合作为一期终点候选。 ｜ 价值分 1.9/5（★★☆☆☆）
全文来源
出版商 OA PDF（正文 88,414 字符，已过 DOI 逐字 + 题名指纹双重归属校验）
原文题录
- 英文标题：Frailty Assessment Tools for Adults with Obesity: A Scoping Review.
- 期刊与标识：Obesity surgery · PMID 42955609 · DOI 10.1007/s11695-026-08956-z
C 级证据分级：C 级（预印本 / 观点评论，非原始研究）
本文属观点/评论类文献，不是原始研究。其论点依赖于作者对既有证据的梳理与判断，不构成新的实验证据。本站标注 C 级即为此意——阅读时请把它当作「领域内的思考框架」，而非「研究发现」。
关于本文的文献来源：本站依据 IMA 知识库「五刊监控·深度文献卡片」撰写，依据已获取的期刊全文（方法、样本量与结论已回到原文核对）；未能获取全文的同批条目另行标注「摘要级」，全程未做任何数值推算补全。