研究进展 情报发生 2026-10-31 · 发布于 2026-11-01

AI 无创量化左心室收缩末压:基于计算模拟的方法学验证与年龄趋势

来源:BMC Cardiovasc Disord · PMID 42958052 · DOI 10.1186/s12872-026-06358-8 · 来源:IMA 知识库《文献层·文献监控卡片》2026-10-31 期 · 全文级(file_id dmlmcfQeUyzO,实际下载核验) · 全文已获取并通过归属校验

时间标签:数据日期 2026-10-31 · 生成时间 2026-11-01 05:30(Asia/Shanghai)| 检索窗口 PubMed edat 2026/10/28–2026/10/31 | 情报发生日期 2026-10-31

研究问题

Given the inherent challenges of invasive left ventricular (LV) catheterization for PVL quantification, non-invasive methods using echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging have gained prominence and been validated against invasive measurements [, ].;We hypothesized that incorporating a measure of arterial stiffness would improve LVESP prediction across the lifespan.

方法

Physiologically plausible individuals were retained by excluding subjects (N = 537) with simulated aortic or brachial BPs outside the 99% age-specific confidence intervals of reference healthy values [].;Values predicted in the validation cohort using this methodology are denoted LVESPRF.;LVESP was also predicted using the equations described by Kelly et al. in the validation cohort []:0.9 × SBP (LVESP0.9xSBP)2/3 SBP + 1/3 DBP (LVESP2/3SBP+1/3DBP) Variables were assessed for normality using Q-Q plots and quantitatively with the Shapiro–Wilk test.;Statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05.

核心结论

LVESPsim increased from 95 ± 7 mmHg at age 25 to 107 ± 8 mmHg at age 75.;Brachial SBP and cfPWV followed a similar trend, whilst brachial DBP decreased from 72 ± 6 to 69 ± 7 mmHg.;Before model development, 767 patients were withheld as the internal hold-out validation cohort, which showed no significant differences with the remaining 3,070 patients in the derivation set (Supplementary Table 1). ‖ 结论:These results warrant validation in vivo to ascertain real-world predictive performance.

局限

In the present study, we found that LVESP0.9xSBP and LVESP2/3SBP+1/3DBP were strongly correlated with LVESP, albeit less so than LVESPRF and LVESPLASSO, demonstrating that these simple equations remain broadly valid provided their limitations are considered.;This is exemplified in our healthy cohort as there are no co-morbidities associated with arterial stiffness that could confound this relationship [].;This suggests that non-invasive LVESP estimation may be less accurate at higher pressures and that LVESP2/3SBP+1/3DBP should be used with caution in populations with elevated LVESP, such as patients with hypertension.

对本项目的价值

★☆☆☆☆ 方法学进展决定我们能否在有限样本下检出真实效应,属基础设施级收益。最大样本量约 3,837。

全文来源

PMC JATS 全文(正文 22,426 字符,已过标题/DOI 逐字归属校验)

原文题录

  • 英文标题:Artificial intelligence-enabled non-invasive quantification of left ventricular end-systolic pressure: an in silico analysis.
  • 期刊与标识:BMC Cardiovasc Disord · PMID 42958052 · DOI 10.1186/s12872-026-06358-8

A 级证据分级:A 级(同行评议人体研究)

本文属人体研究证据,但需注意:观察性或小样本干预的结论不等于已证实临床获益;效应量与长期安全性仍需更大规模、更长随访的试验验证。

关于本文的文献来源:本站依据 IMA 知识库「五刊监控·深度文献卡片」撰写,依据已获取的期刊全文(方法、样本量与结论已回到原文核对);未能获取全文的同批条目另行标注「摘要级」,全程未做任何数值推算补全。